Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Friday, July 10, 2009
The government has failed our kids
Sigh. I hate the U.S. government. And I feel terrible for Obama. Imagine if all Obama did was read the Rant for his news. He’d prolly quit his job seein how bad the world is that he has to face. He lives and breathes this shit every day, all day. But you gotta love capitalism. I blame capitalism because capitalism is a way of sayin “Greed is good”. And everyone knows what happens to a greedy person…And we can see what is happening to a greedy America. They’ve taken money right out of the kids mouths (and brains). If the education system fails, what next? I already think kids are gettin dumber by the minute and these old folks with the old money are gonna die soon, so who is gonna take over in their place? Their dumb grandkids? What’s the solution? If we get rid of the government completely (and let people rule), that will be disastrous so throw that solution out the window. If things keep progressing the way they are (which they most likely will since people are a creature of habit and don’t welcome change), America will hit a rock bottom that they’ve only read about in history books (if the older folks are still alive, the younger ones didn’t take history since it couldn’t be funded). Only from there will a new style of government emerge which finally puts the people first. And I don’t mean that in a socialist “service to the people” kinda way. And I don’t mean it in a capitalist “allow the people to do whatever they want” kinda way either. I think it will be a hybrid. A pure and true one. It will last for about 100 years and then déjà vu, lol. People are habitual. Someone is gonna want more power or more money eventually and bring the empire back down.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Does government beget violence?
Hm, Emily Chang can play with my wang anytime. Rude? Yes. Do I apologize? No. But it’s good to hear that religion can separate men so far to the point that even if you look like me, I’ll still kill you because your god is different. It’s totally pathetic. I mean, what religion promotes violence against others to begin with? It’s these terrible governments and the terrible hearts of men. Instead of offerin protection for everyone and creatin propaganda that resolves differences, everyone holds to their guns (pun intended) and tries to make life miserable for anyone who doesn’t share their religious views. I mean it happens here all the time. I don’t understand why a government would want to keep their people separated. It only leads to senseless violence. Why don’t governments approach their jobs as a way to unify their community, state, or country? Since when has it been wrong for someone in power to change their views and encompass a little bit of what everyone wants? And I do know that there are some politicians that do so, but why not all of them? Why do they have to get on their own agenda? Why do they have to talk to the media and twist things around so that they look like a hero to their select followers instead of a hero for all people? This shit in China? If the government properly stepped in and addressed the needs of the Uyghur, they wouldn’t be rioting. Listen, I know that you can’t please everyone and you can’t make all the changes that are needed. What I don’t understand is why they turn miniscule things into things against their morals and values. With the exception of abortion, I don’t see how Dems and Reps can’t work together better. It’s not like one group promotes murder, stealing, and raping while the other group is against it. I need my own island ASAP; I can’t deal with governing bodies anymore.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
They can say that on the web?
I’m just shocked that “bitch” is a word that allowed on a web video. I think the FCC should look into this because if my child is gonna learn cuss words, it’s gonna be from readin my blog! And to my favorite anti-government reader, I expect you to disagree with me on this. Because if the FCC does start monitoring video news then they would have to expand and possibly start another division. Like I said, expansion of the government is only natural.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Might as well give John his bonus
When it comes to investing, there is one rule all investor go by (at least the good ones): Never dump money into a company that is going bankrupt. All the politicians in the country and not one of them took an econ class? The U.S. government has lost $16 billi of the 700 meant to help bail out Wall St. I understand that you need to spend money to make money, but you don’t LOSE money to make money. What the fuck has the financial district done in two months to have already lost the 16? Mismanagement like a muthafucka. We need to do what everyone has said all along and put that money back in the consumer’s pockets in the form of erasing debt. Once I’m debt free, I will ball outta control. I will move into a new apt, I will buy a new car, I will shop till I drop. I pay back around $700/month in student loans. If I had $700 extra a month, I could easily split it in half and use the money to bump up my lifestyle. Stupid fuckin government. Where’s Change when you need it?
Friday, September 19, 2008
Socialism? Communism? Asshole-ism
Life isn't fair. That’s the bottom line. And it never will be. A government that is supposed to be for the people is in place to try to make life as fair as possible. You don't wanna increase taxes the rich for making money, fine. The common fear is it will make people not want to work as hard to make money. I see. But taxing someone who doesn’t make shit to begin with is fine, because everybody has to pay taxes. I’m really confused by this because going by that logic pretty much means, if you are poor, too bad? So then what’s the point of the government? If it isn’t going to serve its people, we should just rule ourselves. So who will be the people in power? Of course the rich people, they have more resources. Sounds like a plan. Let’s live in a world controlled by the rich. Wait, that sounds like how we live now. Has it worked? Eh, I guess it depends on how much money you make. So what do we do about the poor people? Kill them? Ship them to an island? But who is going to babysit your kids when you go to your $25K dinner tonite? Isabella is gone, you had her killed for being poor, remember?
Ok, so we need poor people. But we don’t want to help them become rich? Hypocrites. I love it when people say “nobody help me get rich, I busted my ass to get where I’m at.” Like they lived in a cave alllll by themselves, and didn’t go to school (they must been self educated), and grew all they food, and made all their clothes. They didn’t need anything from anybody. All by themselves. HA, humans can be so full of themselves sometimes and I know because I’m a Leo lol. Or I also like when people say “I studied hard, got good grades, went to good schools, and got a good job. If I can do it, why can’t they?” Well for starters 80% of the people that say this: A) Had a good support structure at home (even if you came from a single parent household, you still had aunts and uncles and naanas that looked after ya snotty nose ass) B) Lived in a decent neighborhood C) Had ambitious peers to help guide them along. So yeah, it probably was easy for you to focus on school since the rest of your life wasn’t in shambles. “I don’t see why I have to work hard in order to help someone who doesn’t work at all.” This argument is about the only valid-ish (meaning it’s not necessarily valid, but it has some “valid” like characteristics) statement. Why should I work hard for someone else to live off of? Well blame the founding fathers for that. They got tired of the King havin all the gold and the pussy and enjoyin the hell outta life, so they decided that the next person that will run their lives will do it with their best interests in mind. “But but but, nowhere in the Constitution does it say ‘the right to welfare’ or ‘the right to collect unemployment checks’”. True it doesn’t, but when all this was being discussed back when they were tryin to figure out who should rule, the main theme (idea) was that everyone should have the right to enjoy a standard of decent living. Meaning that, while not everyone would own a horse and carriage with gold horse shoes and spinning wagon wheels, everybody would be able to use some form of transportation to get from one place to another. While everyone may not eat caviar as a midnight snack after clubbing till 4am, everyone would have somethin in their fridge to eat. “So what does that do with me? Why am I payin?” Well since the government can’t really charge you for the services it provides, it has to collect money from someone. That’s what taxes are all about. Why pay taxes to begin with? Well the government doesn’t expect you or the citizens to rally together and raise $400 milli for a “bridge to nowhere”. I mean, it’s not like the rich needed a bridge (he just bought a jet and put it on the government’s tab). The government also uses money to help people purchase food. You can’t go into a supermarket and purchase Angus beef with your welfare card, but you can get some Hamburger Helper.
Everybody hates the idea of spending billions on saving lives (universal healthcare), but spending billions to take lives (war) is a great fuckin idea. Simply put, ya’ll disgust me. To feel no sympathy for someone else because it doesn’t directly affect you…I can’t even put into words. Don’t vote Obama. Fine. Don’t vote McCain either. Put your name on the ballot, and vote for yourself.
Ok, so we need poor people. But we don’t want to help them become rich? Hypocrites. I love it when people say “nobody help me get rich, I busted my ass to get where I’m at.” Like they lived in a cave alllll by themselves, and didn’t go to school (they must been self educated), and grew all they food, and made all their clothes. They didn’t need anything from anybody. All by themselves. HA, humans can be so full of themselves sometimes and I know because I’m a Leo lol. Or I also like when people say “I studied hard, got good grades, went to good schools, and got a good job. If I can do it, why can’t they?” Well for starters 80% of the people that say this: A) Had a good support structure at home (even if you came from a single parent household, you still had aunts and uncles and naanas that looked after ya snotty nose ass) B) Lived in a decent neighborhood C) Had ambitious peers to help guide them along. So yeah, it probably was easy for you to focus on school since the rest of your life wasn’t in shambles. “I don’t see why I have to work hard in order to help someone who doesn’t work at all.” This argument is about the only valid-ish (meaning it’s not necessarily valid, but it has some “valid” like characteristics) statement. Why should I work hard for someone else to live off of? Well blame the founding fathers for that. They got tired of the King havin all the gold and the pussy and enjoyin the hell outta life, so they decided that the next person that will run their lives will do it with their best interests in mind. “But but but, nowhere in the Constitution does it say ‘the right to welfare’ or ‘the right to collect unemployment checks’”. True it doesn’t, but when all this was being discussed back when they were tryin to figure out who should rule, the main theme (idea) was that everyone should have the right to enjoy a standard of decent living. Meaning that, while not everyone would own a horse and carriage with gold horse shoes and spinning wagon wheels, everybody would be able to use some form of transportation to get from one place to another. While everyone may not eat caviar as a midnight snack after clubbing till 4am, everyone would have somethin in their fridge to eat. “So what does that do with me? Why am I payin?” Well since the government can’t really charge you for the services it provides, it has to collect money from someone. That’s what taxes are all about. Why pay taxes to begin with? Well the government doesn’t expect you or the citizens to rally together and raise $400 milli for a “bridge to nowhere”. I mean, it’s not like the rich needed a bridge (he just bought a jet and put it on the government’s tab). The government also uses money to help people purchase food. You can’t go into a supermarket and purchase Angus beef with your welfare card, but you can get some Hamburger Helper.
Everybody hates the idea of spending billions on saving lives (universal healthcare), but spending billions to take lives (war) is a great fuckin idea. Simply put, ya’ll disgust me. To feel no sympathy for someone else because it doesn’t directly affect you…I can’t even put into words. Don’t vote Obama. Fine. Don’t vote McCain either. Put your name on the ballot, and vote for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)